Big pharma
cartelconspiracy theory
| "Conspiracy theory" Big pharma link () NNDB | |
|---|---|
| File:Big pharma.jpg | |
| Interests | drugs, Pandemic/Preparation, Genetic modification |
| The multinational drug companies, supposedly in competition, but who have interlocking interests and personnel, and who operate a revolving door with their supposed regulatory agencies, now long since captured. | |
Big pharma is a shorthand for referring to the large pharmaceutical companies.
Official narrative
Wikipedia has an article entitled Big Pharma conspiracy theory which, as the title suggests, . Most concerns around big pharma are illegitimate.
Advertising
Advertising and marketing is so important to big pharma that "9 out of the top 10 industry leaders spend more on marketing than on research and development",[1] while some commercially-controlled media writers like to point at R&D and trials as the cause of high prices.[2] (Pfizer addresses the question of high prices on its website, but does not really answer it)[3]
Legal cases of note
Those who are adversely affected by medications, even when not warned about them on the label, were determined in a 5-4 decision by the US Supreme Court not to be liable to financial compensation.[4]
Lobbying
- Full article: Big pharma/Lobby
- Full article: Big pharma/Lobbyist
- Full article: Big pharma/Lobby
Big Pharma spends much more on governmental lobbying and "public relations" than any other industry.[5]
Manipulation of studies
Pharma companies manipulate studies for publication by choosing and excluding parameters beforehand, thus framing the findings:
- the medication will be tested against another one, from which is known, that it is inferior in it's effectiveness
- the medication will be tested against another one, which is administered in lesser dosage than to be effective
- the medication will be tested against another one, which is administered in higher dosage to let the own medication appear less toxic
- the formulation of questions beforehand will be done in such a way, that positive results are guaranteed
- only positive results will be publicized, which may be clinical endpoints like: survival time, pain relief, blood pressure - but relative risk or absolute risk may not not change and are not mentioned
- adverse reaction from vaccines is by and in large caused by adjuvants; control studies with a "placebo" are done with the same adjuvants without the pathogen, to show that side effects are equally on both sides
In 2015, Richard Horton, editor of the prestigious medical journal the Lancet, wrote bluntly of these problems. A symposium—on the reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research, held at the Wellcome Trust in London discussed "one of the most sensitive issues in science today: the idea that something has gone fundamentally wrong with one of our greatest human creations." Pointing out that "part of the problem is that no-one is incentivised to be right. Instead, scientists are incentivized to be productive and innovative" he also stated[6][7]:
{{#subobject: |Has superobject=Big pharma |Has objectClass=Quotation |Has author=Richard Horton|+sep=, |Has text=“Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.” |Is about=Big pharma,Big pharma, The Lancet, Medical Faculties, Medical research, Rigged science, Science, Scientism|+sep=, |Has wikipediaPage= |Has location=|+sep=, |Has publicationDate=2015 |Sourced from= |Has sourceDetails= |Has sourceTitle= |Has sourceName= |Has sourceURL=https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)60696-1/fulltext
}}
“Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”
Richard Horton (2015) [8]
Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and was longtime Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ), considered to be another one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals in the world, has made similar observations[9]:
{{#subobject: |Has superobject=Big pharma |Has objectClass=Quotation |Has author=Marcia Angell|+sep=, |Has text=“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.” |Is about=Big pharma,Big Pharma, New England Journal of Medicine, Medical research, Rigged science, Science, Scientism|+sep=, |Has wikipediaPage= |Has location=|+sep=, |Has publicationDate=2009 |Sourced from= |Has sourceDetails= |Has sourceTitle= |Has sourceName= |Has sourceURL=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2009/jan/15/drug-companies-doctorsa-story-of-corruption/?pagination=false
}}
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.”
Marcia Angell (2009) [10]
Weblinks
- Rockefeller Medicine a report by James Corbett - Video links
References
- ↑ https://www.thedrswolfson.com/governments-food-companies-big-pharma-media-healthcare-operators-keep-us-fat-sick/
- ↑ https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterubel/2017/04/07/why-medications-are-so-expensive-in-one-map/
- ↑ http://archive.today/2021.11.04-032031/https://www.pfizer.com/news/featured_stories/featured_stories_detail/why_are_some_medicines_so_expensive_today
- ↑ July 7, 2013Supreme Court rules Drug Companies exempt from Lawsuits
- ↑ https://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/top.php?showYear=2017&indexType=i
- ↑ https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)60696-1/fulltext
- ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20200319012415/https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2815%2960696-1/fulltext
- ↑ https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)60696-1/fulltext
- ↑ http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2009/jan/15/drug-companies-doctorsa-story-of-corruption/?pagination=false saved at Archive.is
- ↑ http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2009/jan/15/drug-companies-doctorsa-story-of-corruption/?pagination=false