Biological weapon

Wikipedia coverage: Read the full Wikipedia article, including its references. The material below is the existing Deep Politics Wiki article.

Biological weapon link (WMD, Poison)
A "bioterrorist" could use Biological weapons. Researched in Level 4 Bioweapons labs.

Bioterror and Bioterrorism link here.

Biological weapons are organisms, viruses or biological toxins intended for use as destructive agents, typically by infecting and incapacitating or killing people.

Legality

Research into biological weapons is allowed for defensive purposes. In practice, this is difficult or impossible to differentiate from offensive research. ^{[Citation Needed]}

Official narrative

A "bioterrorist" attack is something we need to be prepared for. Preparing for "pandemics" might be a test case for a more severe "bioterrorist" attack.

So called "Feature enhancement"

Full article: Biological weapon/Research

To deny offensive research, making viruses more dangerous for humans is called "feature enhancement" or "gain-of-function". {{#subobject: |Has superobject=Biological weapon |Has objectClass=Quotation |Has author=|+sep=, |Has text=“The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus features a so-called furin cleavage site (FCS), which makes the virus more infectious and virulent than it would otherwise be. Such an FCS is not known in any other SARS-like coronavirus, but it is often inserted as part of gain-of-function studies in virus research. However, similar FCS are known to occur in non-SARS-like coronaviruses, hence a natural origin cannot be excluded based on this. The furin cleavage site found in SARS-CoV-2 uses an arginine (amino acid) double codon, which is rather rare in natural coronaviruses, but quite common in engineered viruses used in lab experiments (...)” |Is about=Biological weapon,COVID-19/Origins, Pandemic/Preparation, Disaster/Preparation|+sep=, |Has wikipediaPage= |Has location=|+sep=, |Has publicationDate= |Sourced from= |Has sourceDetails=(emphasis added) |Has sourceTitle= |Has sourceName= |Has sourceURL=https://swprs.org/on-the-origin-of-sars-coronavirus-2/

}}

“The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus features a so-called furin cleavage site (FCS), which makes the virus more infectious and virulent than it would otherwise be. Such an FCS is not known in any other SARS-like coronavirus, but it is often inserted as part of gain-of-function studies in virus research. However, similar FCS are known to occur in non-SARS-like coronaviruses, hence a natural origin cannot be excluded based on this. The furin cleavage site found in SARS-CoV-2 uses an arginine (amino acid) double codon, which is rather rare in natural coronaviruses, but quite common in engineered viruses used in lab experiments (...)”
'

Watch on YouTube

False Flags and the Dawn of Bioterrorism (29:08) a 2020 short documentary by James Corbett, a contextual history and critical overview of the threat of the military industrial biological technocracy and their duplicitous "defensive" threat to humanity. "For the past twenty years, the world has been in the midst of a so-called "war on terror" set in motion by a false flag attack of spectacular proportions. Now the stage is being set for a new spectacular attack to usher in the next stage in that war on terror: the war on bioterrorism. But who are the real bioterrorists? And can we rely on government agencies, their appointed health authorities, and the corporate media to accurately identify those terrorists in the wake of the next spectacular terror attack?"

Problems with the official narrative

{{#subobject: |Has superobject=Biological weapon |Has objectClass=Quotation |Has author=Sasha Latypova|+sep=, |Has text=“Fabricating scary narratives about superbugs is much easier than delivering on promises of making those bugs in labs. This is also a very productive avenue as people are woefully gullible and thus can be controlled by narratives just as effectively as by an actual scary-scary bioengineered virus. Biodefense is a huge grift on both sides. 'Their' side appropriates money and power, and new billion dollar agencies for 'Pandemic Preparedness'. 'Our' side gets millions of followers talking about them evil guys, or spinning stories about biolabs in Wuhan, Ukraine and lately California. They leak' from labs almost every week, and using CRISPER gene drive narrative logic, all mice in the world should look like Ralph Baric by now.” |Is about=Biological weapon,CRISPR,Ralph Baric,lab leak,biodefense,gene drive|+sep=, |Has wikipediaPage= |Has location=|+sep=, |Has publicationDate=November 2023 |Sourced from= |Has sourceDetails= |Has sourceTitle= |Has sourceName= |Has sourceURL=https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/weaponization-of-disease-agents

}}

“Fabricating scary narratives about superbugs is much easier than delivering on promises of making those bugs in labs. This is also a very productive avenue as people are woefully gullible and thus can be controlled by narratives just as effectively as by an actual scary-scary bioengineered virus. Biodefense is a huge grift on both sides. 'Their' side appropriates money and power, and new billion dollar agencies for 'Pandemic Preparedness'. 'Our' side gets millions of followers talking about them evil guys, or spinning stories about biolabs in Wuhan, Ukraine and lately California. They leak' from labs almost every week, and using CRISPER gene drive narrative logic, all mice in the world should look like Ralph Baric by now.”
Sasha Latypova (November 2023) 

There are a large number government-funded biolabs researching gain-of-function viruses. Over the decades there should have been thousands of leaked viruses leading to deadly epidemics - but this is not the case. This leads to the strong suspicion that the danger from contaminable biological agents is overrated, and that the claims are there as a part of a power grab with "pandemic countermeasures" - or "vaccines" which might be the real weapons. Even, HIV, which might have had some gain-of-function research and might have been injected into Africans in the 1980s in an attempted depopulation, did not live up to its claimed effects, and does not cause AIDS.

Preparations

Full article: Biological weapon/Preparation

In over 200 cases the US tested bioweapons on their own citizens, according to 'official' news in the commercially-controlled media. Preparations overlap with "Terrorism/Preparation" since Anthrax was used in a false flag event and Pandemic/Preparation as the proposed solution is preemtive development and large scale funding of new (genetically modified) vaccines.

Ethnic bioweapon

The development of ethnic bioweapons and their projected use has been a matter of discussion for decades.

Events

2002-2003 SARS epidemic in Southern China

Full article: SARS

In 2003 ABC News reported on Sergei Kolesnikov's claim that the virus was made in a laboratory. The Sydney Morning Herald headlined a 2008 article SARS a Chinese weapon: Taiwan official which began "Taiwan's top national security chief was forced to apologise after suggesting the deadly SARS virus could have been developed in Chinese laboratories as a bio-weapon. National Security Bureau director Tsai Chao-ming..."

2009 avian flu contamination

In February 2009, Baxter International shipped 72 kg material to 16 laboratories in 4 countries. The material was marked as vaccine, but contained live H5N1 avian flu virus material as well as a mix of H3N2 seasonal flu viruses.

2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak‎‎

Full article: 2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak‎‎

In late 2019 Covid-19 was detected, first in China, leading the Commercially-controlled media to assume it originated there. The suggestion that it might be a man-made biological weapon was met with widespread censorship by the commercially-controlled media (most obviously Twitter).

Level 4 Bioweapons labs

File:Map US Biodefense Program.jpg

Research into the most hazardous substances and so called "feature enhancement" is carried out at Biosafety level 4 facilities. The diseases studied there are fatal to humans and animals and with no known cure.

USA

The United States operates a high number of level 4 labs worldwide. Accidents and carelessness on the side management shows, that it is not possible to operate these labs, even those with the highest security level, safely all the time. Especially notorious is the Plum Island bio lab near Long island. It was operated only as a biosafety level 3 lab, but it stands as an well documented example for technical and administrative problems that these facilities face. The research facility at Fort Detrick was shut down by the CDC in July 2019, citing failure to follow local procedures, lack of periodic recertification training for workers in the biocontainment laboratories and problems with the wastewater decontamination system.

China

File:2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak map.jpg

The only such facility in mainland China is the Wuhan Institute of Virology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 8.6 miles from the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market which the World Health Organization linked to the first reported cluster of Covid-19 patients, 44 people who became unwell with pneumonia of unknown cause, at the start of what was then referred to as the Wuhan coronavirus outbreak, later the 2020 coronavirus pandemic.

References