Fact checking
| "Fact checking" (Propaganda, Orwellian language) | |
|---|---|
| File:Fact checker-KamVTV.webp | |
| A thinly veiled effort to counter suspicion in official narratives as promoted by the commercially-controlled media. i.e. "Trust us, we've fact checked this article". |
"Fact checking" is a phrase used by the commercially-controlled media to suggest the open-minded checking of facts. In fact, the activities of "fact checkers" are de facto tightly circumscribed by the funding institution, and may include promotion of deliberate misinformation.[1]
Launch
"Fact checking" rose to prominence as part of the ill-fated "fake news website" campaign was launched in Autumn 2016, most notably with the Washington Post promotion of the Propornot List that was printed under the name Craig Timberg.
Concerns
The process of "fact checking" assumes that there are impartial people (or algorithms). In fact such "fact checkers" do not, arguably cannot, exist.[2]
In a legal case John Stossel has brought forth against Facebook, the later decided to claim that it's "fact-checks" are "protected opinion".[3][4] In US law, a factual claim that is not true can be litigated, while opinion is protected speech - only Facebook, up until that point, wanted to make everyone believe that these are reliable checks-of-facts.
Fact checkers
- Full article: Fact checker
- Full article: Fact checker
Professional "fact checkers" test whether information conforms to their employers' opinions. If it does not, they pronounce it "false". Some "fact checkers" receive support from deep state groups to prop up deep state official narrativesTemplate:Cn, others such as Bulgaria Analytica have notably opaque sources of funding.
Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected = operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.
Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.
Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.Expression error: Unexpected > operator.
References
- ↑ https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/20/facebook-labels-224-misinformation/
- ↑ https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2017/03/30/report-supposedly-impartial-fact-checkers-driven-political-prejudices/
- ↑ https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2021/12/13/facebook-admits-in-court-that-fact-checks-are-just-opinion/
- ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20211209171725/https://wattsupwiththat.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Facebook-admits-its-fact-check-is-opinion-page-2.pdf