The Anglo-American Establishment
US/Deep state, UK/Deep state, Milner Group, Cliveden Set, Cecil Rhodes
| The Anglo-American Establishment link Amazon(book) | |
|---|---|
| File:The Anglo-American Establishment.jpg | |
| Type | book |
| Publication date | 1981 |
| Author(s) | Carroll Quigley |
| Subjects | US/Deep state, UK/Deep state, Milner Group, Cliveden Set, Cecil Rhodes |
| Source | Link |
| A book by Carroll Quigley which helped expose the UK and US Deep states. | |
The Anglo-American Establishment is a book by Carroll Quigley about the evolution of the UK deep state in the early 20th century. Published in 1981, 4 years after his death, it is a meticulous study of anglophone deep politics. The Milner Group lists on this website were derived from it. Quigley's information about the group was derived from an unnamed insider, whom Stanley Monteith identified as Alfred Zimmern, who left the group in 1922.
Origins
Stanley Monteith stated that Alfred Zimmern spoke to Quigley about the Milner Group, which sparked 20 years of research by Quigley.
Two-party system
{{#subobject: |Has superobject=The Anglo-American Establishment |Has objectClass=Quotation |Has author=Carroll Quigley|+sep=, |Has text=“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can "throw the rascals out" at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy. … Either party in office becomes in time corrupt, tired, unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies” |Is about=The Anglo-American Establishment,Republican Party,Democratic Party, US/Presidential Election,Election|+sep=, |Has wikipediaPage= |Has location=|+sep=, |Has publicationDate=1966 |Sourced from= |Has sourceDetails= |Has sourceTitle= |Has sourceName= |Has sourceURL=https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7250970-the-argument-that-the-two-parties-should-represent-opposed-ideals
}}
“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can "throw the rascals out" at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy. … Either party in office becomes in time corrupt, tired, unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies”
Carroll Quigley (1966) [1]
Local copy