WEF

Wikipedia coverage: Read the full Wikipedia article, including its references. The material below is the existing Deep Politics Wiki article.

lobbyists, deep state faction?NGONonprofit organization

"NGO"  WEF  link () Campfire Wiki Facebook ModernHistoryProject Powerbase Sourcewatch Website
File:Wef logo.png
Abbreviation	WEF
Motto	Committed to improving the state of the world
Founder	Klaus Schwab
Headquarters	Cologny, Switzerland
Type	Nonprofit organization
Interests	Globalisation, Platformization
An NGO with plans for sweeping social change. Hundreds of its members were active in using COVID-19 to carry out a "Great Reset" to dispossess most people with wage slavery, forms of platformization, a Social credit system and Transhumanism ending in some sort of Neo-feudalism with a 20/80 society.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is one of the key think-tanks and meeting places for the management of global capitalism, possibly coherent enough to qualify as a deep state faction. Under the leadership of professor Klaus Schwab, it has played an increasingly important role in coordinating the big corporations' rule of the world over the last three decades.

Many WEF members actively used COVID-19 to carry out a "Great Reset" to dispossess most people and institute a techno-feudalism.

"Do not confuse the WEF with some new experiment in control. It is the Nazi Party re-emerging from its cloaked existence. Nazism IS the NWO."

Annual meeting

Full article: WEF/Annual Meeting

Around 2,500 people meet for the WEF annual meeting. This is usually held in Davos, attended by one of the biggest ski resorts in Switzerland. Therefore the whole WEF is often simply referred to as "Davos". The business leaders (the core attendees), international political leaders, central bankers, think-tankers, economists, celebrities and journalists gather for up to five days to discuss global issues, across 500 sessions, providing a platform for dialogue and serving as a catalyst for action.

Individuals pay up to $US50,000 for membership of this elite group, and up to half-a-million for premium corporate memberships.

Several invitees have been members of the Bilderberg group, especially members of the Bilderberg Steering Committee, and the participants to a large extent overlap with other establishment groups and networks. For many years, the importance of the WEF to a large extent went under the radar, especially by alternative media. Well over 100 Bilderbergers are busy managing COVID-19, many of them also WEF members.

Origins

File:Economic Management Forum (1971).jpg

The "Economic Management Symposium" in 1971

In the summer of 1971, Klaus Schwab invited 444 executives from Western European firms to the first European Management Symposium held in the Davos Congress Centre under the patronage of the European Commission and European industrial associations, where Schwab sought to introduce European firms to American management practices. The success of such an ambitious project has given rise to the suggestion that Schwab was a front man for an established deep politician such as Henry Kissinger.Template:Cn

Over the years it has grown to a large unwieldy event, with up close to 3000 participants being involved, plus their assistants and servants. In addition to the public, well broadcast forum discussions, there are many private meetings of a much more select character.

Informal Gathering of World Economic Leaders

Starting in 1982, inside the Annual Meeting, the Forum held it first Informal Gathering of World Economic Leaders (IGWEL). This closed-door, off-the-record meeting allows for informal dialogue, permitting participants to get to know each another, exchange ideas and work on ongoing issues and problems without having to produce a communiqué, treaty, press statement or any other document at its conclusion. According to the WEF "IGWEL remains enormously attractive to participants as the only global framework for an interdisciplinary exchange of ideas and opinions of government leaders and heads of international organizations."

Gro Harlem Brundtland wrote how:

One of the least known, but most influential meetings at the Annual Meeting is the IGWEL, or the Informal Group of World Economic Leaders. It is a private assembly of heads of state and government, cabinet ministers, heads of international organizations and other invited persons. IGWEL holds three informal sessions during the course of the meeting and sets its own agenda. As every year, the Rapporteur summarizes the discussions for the press....Within the Informal Group, some warned against the concept of global governance because it could easily be misinterpreted.

Activities

The group is active in promoting social change in a very specific direction: the minimisation of democratic input and the increase of corporate control of society.

File:Aperitif-auf-der-terrasse 2007.png

Many of the initial cadre of Global Leaders for Tomorrow 1993 were heading up national governments by 2007 when they met up at the G8 summit. Next to President G. W. Bush here are four of them: José Barroso, Angela Merkel, Vladimir Putin (suspected member, see note) and Tony Blair

Deep state recruitment fora

In 1992 the WEF launched a major recruitment project, which has involved thousands of people, including dozens who were to go on to lead nation states. The exact extent of the project is difficult to track, since the WEF has never published all the names, and members almost never mention their recruitment on their CVs. Many of the intake were to play active roles in the COVID-19 event.

Global Leaders for Tomorrow

Full article: WEF/Global Leaders for Tomorrow

In 1992 the WEF launched its Global Leaders for Tomorrow project, which run until 2003, recruiting cadres of people "committed to social, environmental and economic issues in society." Richard Werner, a member of the last year's intake, the Global Leaders for Tomorrow 2003 cadre, reports that the program was closed down because too many people were asking difficult questions, leading Klaus Schwab to announce a revised, more controllable group, the Young Global Leaders, in 2004.

File:Wikispooks on WEF Young Leaders2.png

Young Global Leaders

Full article: WEF/Young Global Leaders

The Young Global Leaders project reports that it aims to connect its members "to a community of remarkable peers and investing further in their leadership abilities". This project continued the WEF's Global Leaders for Tomorrow, but in a more controllable format. The inaugural 2005 class comprised 237 young leaders. New annual intakes continue up to the WEF/Young Global Leaders 2021 group.

Global Shapers

Full article: WEF/Global Shapers

The Global Shapers Community focuses on people below the Young Global Leaders program.

The Great Reset

Full article: the Great Reset

The WEF is central in the implementation of the Great Reset, an audacious and immensely far-reaching plan to institute a global corporate technocracy.

Timeline:

• 2014: WEF publishes meeting agenda entitled: “The Reshaping of the World: Consequences for Society, Politics and Business.”
• 2015: WEF publishes article in collaboration with VOX EU called: “We need to press restart on the global economy.”
• 2016: WEF holds panel called: “How to reboot the global economy.”
• 2017: WEF publishes article saying: “Our world needs a reset in how we operate – and cooperate – to tackle our greatest long-term challenges, starting today.”
• 2018: Johns Hopkins holds the Clade X pandemic planning exercise, remarked upon be the WEF in July 2018
• 2019: Johns Hopkins holds the pandemic planning exercise Event 201, this time in cooperation with the WEF and the B&M Gates Foundation
• 2020: Klaus Schwab publishes his book: “COVID-19: The Great Reset”

Event 201

Full article: Event 201

File:Event 201.jpg

Event 201, a WEF/Johns Hopkins pandemic planning event about a deadly coronavirus, held in Autumn 2019

The WEF was one of the organizers of the notorious pandemic planning exercise, Event 201. Its timing, and the fact that the drill foresaw a global deviation from standard operating procedure to carry out events such as virus lockdowns has heightened suspicion that the planners were aware of what was to play out in 2020.

The Fourth Industrial Revolution

Another concept frequently pushed by the WEF is The Fourth Industrial Revolution. The phrase itself was first introduced by Klaus Schwab in a 2015 article published by Foreign Affairs.

On 10 October 2016, the WEF announced the opening of its new Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution in San Francisco. According to the WEF, the center will "serve as a platform for interaction, insight and impact on the scientific and technological changes that are changing the way we live, work and relate to one another".

In April 2020 they stated that the "WEF Hopes to Restart Global Economy With Blockchain Technology" after the COVID-19/Lockdowns.

Abolition of property

File:Own nothing be happy.png

"You", not "We", "will own nothing and be happy" in 2030. The WEF will take the tweet down in late 2020.

In a short fiction story by Ida Auken (Member of the Parliament of Denmark) on the WEforum website from late 2016 she envisions a future in which no one has any private property anymore, since the concept of ownership became obsolete in a city where everything can be ordered as a service. She points out that this is not her "utopia or dream of the future", however, this article is very much in line with a talk she held in 2015, in which she more or less promoted the concept: {{#subobject: |Has superobject=WEF |Has objectClass=Quotation |Has author=Ida Auken|+sep=, |Has text=“And if you lease, why should­n’t you lease your refrig­er­a­tor, or your wash­ing machine, or our dish­wash­er. Why do you want to own it? I mean it’s not like the plas­tic and the met­al is like, ​“You! I own it.” A bro­ken dish­wash­er. I mean wow.

No, why don’t you want to go into a busi­ness mod­el where the com­pa­ny owns it? You know what hap­pens when the com­pa­ny owns it? Actually, they can bring down the prices because they don’t have to buy new met­al and new plas­tic.” |Is about=WEF,Abolition of property|+sep=, |Has wikipediaPage= |Has location=|+sep=, |Has publicationDate= |Sourced from= |Has sourceDetails=http://opentranscripts.org/transcript/future-without-waste/ |Has sourceTitle= |Has sourceName= |Has sourceURL=

}}

“And if you lease, why should­n’t you lease your refrig­er­a­tor, or your wash­ing machine, or our dish­wash­er. Why do you want to own it? I mean it’s not like the plas­tic and the met­al is like, ​“You! I own it.” A bro­ken dish­wash­er. I mean wow. No, why don’t you want to go into a busi­ness mod­el where the com­pa­ny owns it? You know what hap­pens when the com­pa­ny owns it? Actually, they can bring down the prices because they don’t have to buy new met­al and new plas­tic.”
Ida Auken

File:WEF own nothing commentary-2.png

Her intentions and concerns for the environment may be genuine, but like privatisation before, it could be used to rob people of their remaining rights and create over time, in a period of multiple decades into the next century, the population for a new feudal system. Not officially connected, but the United Nations plan Agenda21 focuses to some extent on migration into cities, which is a 'naturally' occurring phenomenon anyway. By improving housing in urban areas, and/or gradually stopping municipal services outside specified development regions (cities and their suburbs) it can animate the inflow into these areas.

Fratelli tutti (All Brothers)

In Pope Francis third encyclical: "Fratelli tutti" (All Brothers), he made two points regarding private property that can be seen in a similar way as the article by Ida Auken:

119. In the first Christian centuries, a number of thinkers developed a universal vision in their reflections on the common destination of created goods. This led them to realize that if one person lacks what is necessary to live with dignity, it is because another person is detaining it. Saint John Chrysostom summarizes it in this way: “Not to share our wealth with the poor is to rob them and take away their livelihood. The riches we possess are not our own, but theirs as well”. In the words of Saint Gregory the Great, “When we provide the needy with their basic needs, we are giving them what belongs to them, not to us”.

120. Once more, I would like to echo a statement of Saint John Paul II whose forcefulness has perhaps been insufficiently recognized: “God gave the earth to the whole human race for the sustenance of all its members, without excluding or favouring anyone”. For my part, I would observe that “the Christian tradition has never recognized the right to private property as absolute or inviolable, and has stressed the social purpose of all forms of private property”. The principle of the common use of created goods is the “first principle of the whole ethical and social order”; it is a natural and inherent right that takes priority over others. All other rights having to do with the goods necessary for the integral fulfilment of persons, including that of private property or any other type of property, should – in the words of Saint Paul VI – “in no way hinder [this right], but should actively facilitate its implementation”. The right to private property can only be considered a secondary natural right, derived from the principle of the universal destination of created goods. This has concrete consequences that ought to be reflected in the workings of society. Yet it often happens that secondary rights displace primary and overriding rights, in practice making them irrelevant.

Climate Change

Over the years, themes such as climate change and sustainability became central themes of discussions. However, the subjects were discussed from the elitist perspective of the richest people in the world, hinting at dystopian top-down plans for "change in consumption patterns", population reduction, etc.

• This environmentalism might function as an idea capable of creating ideological cohesion for the top few thousand richest people in the world.

• Some observers suspect the Greta Thunberg media offensive was orchestrated by the WEF. At the very least Thunberg received red carpet treatment at the WEF summit, unusual for most other struggling activists.

Exposure

In 2021, the involvement of the WEF in COVID-19 was widely exposed.

MPs in European parliaments have been silenced or ridiculed trying to mention the WEF.

Watch on YouTube

Canada Parliament ignores MP's Klaus Schwab question

WEF website

The WEF, at times, deletes articles from it's website.

• An article about Mind Control from November 2018 was deleted: Mind control using sound waves? We ask a scientist how it works
• At the height of the 2022 protests in Sri Lanka and the storming of the president’s house, it was observed that the WEF apparently removed an article by (at the time of the protest) Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe with the title: "How we will make Sri Lanka rich by 2025", later restoring it.

External links

• WEF flickr.com account

References