Jump to content

COVID-19/Origins

From Deep Politics Wiki

 COVID-19/Origins link
(Hamster wheel)
File:COVID-19 Origins.jpg
InterestsCOVID-19
The origins of COVID-19 have become a Hamster wheel topic since about May 2020. The official narrative blames a "lone bat"; the official opposition narrative a "lab leak"; with the distinct possibility that both are red herrings.

{{#subobject: |Has superobject=COVID-19/Origins |Has objectClass=Quotation |Has author=Kit Knightly|+sep=, |Has text=“[A]n entirely fake disease offers total control of your pandemic narrative. It kills who you like, when you like, and stops when you tell it to stop. Your vaccine will definitely work, because it doesn’t have to do anything.” |Is about=COVID-19/Origins,COVID-19, COVID-19/Origin, COVID-19/Vaccines|+sep=, |Has wikipediaPage= |Has location=|+sep=, |Has publicationDate=Jul 29, 2026 |Sourced from= |Has sourceDetails= |Has sourceTitle=Quick Take... the Fauci Diaries and the Lab Leak renaissance |Has sourceName= |Has sourceURL=https://off-guardian.org/2026/07/29/quick-take-the-fauci-diaries-and-the-lab-leak-renaissance/

}}

“[A]n entirely fake disease offers total control of your pandemic narrative. It kills who you like, when you like, and stops when you tell it to stop. Your vaccine will definitely work, because it doesn’t have to do anything.”
Kit Knightly (Jul 29, 2026)  Quick Take... the Fauci Diaries and the Lab Leak renaissance [1]

The origins of "SARS-CoV-2", indeed its very existence as an entity has been a subject of intense debate and dissembling. It was publicly announced in December 2019 after an outbreak in Wuhan, the city housing China's only BSL4 facility, the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The early 2020 official narrative however asserted that a new coronavirus had emerged spontaneously by zoonotic transmission.

In April 2020, an official opposition narrative was promoted by Western commercially-controlled media that implicated the WIV.[2] This so-called "lab leak" thesis was strongly censored for 9 months more, until being adopted as the official narrative in early 2021. The ideas of deliberate release, or leak from labs other than the WIV were still third rail topics as of mid 2021. By the start of 2023, the commercially-controlled media was hinting that the lab leak hypothesis was widely believed all along by a lot of insiders, who had attempted to censor or otherwise obscure the possibility.[3]

COVID dissidents including Jonathan Couey, Sasha Latypova, Mike Yeadon and Michel Chossudovsky have been increasingly strident in denouncing this debate as a false dichotomy, noting the misplaced trust placed in the "COVID tests" as diagnostic tools.

Official narrative

The zoonotic origin theory was initially promoted as most likely, and the remarkable closeness of the WIV to the first reported case was something of a third rail for the commercially-controlled media, which consistently minimised the possibility that the virus might have been genetically modified, although it was supported by such credentialed voices such as Luc Montagnier[4].

In April 2020, a lot of commercially-controlled media briefly pivoted the official narrative towards an azoonotic option, which theY termed "lab leak" rather than "lab release". Implicit in their reporting was the assumption that the lab in question could only have been the WIV, and Donald Trump spoke about the possibility of claiming reparations from China. After a few days[How many?] the commercially-controlled media stopped these stories, and rolled back from "lab leak" to "lone bat", without explanation, so that for the remainder of the year and hint that this was incorrect was taboo.[5] This unusual pattern is likely indicative of as yet unexplained deep political intrigue.

In January 2021 Nicholson Baker wrote the mysteriously popular The Lab-Leak Hypothesis for New York Magazine[5], which was a watershed moment, so that in early 2021 much mention was made of "gain-of-function" research. FOIAed emails were released exposing Peter Daszak's efforts to try to stifle an open discussion on the topic.[6]. As of 2022, in spite of the large weight of evidence supporting the possibility of planned release, the corporate media has not made a corresponding shift in its narrative - it remained a third rail.

Take 1 - Wet Market/"Lone Bat" theory

File:Lancet covid19 first cases.jpg

The official narrative about the origins of the virus, which Ronnie Cummins termed the "lone bat" theory was that it occurred naturally by zoonosis.[7] It was linked this to a seafood market, although a Lancet paper reported that three out of the first four patients had no known connection to it.[8]

Emails later gleaned through FOIA revealed that in February 2020, Peter Daszak, the director of EcoHealth Alliance secretly drafted a statement which included the assertion that "rapid, open, and transparent sharing of data on this outbreak is now being threatened by rumours and misinformation around its origins. We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin." This was published in The Lancet, co-signed by himself and 26 co-authors he had arranged.[9]

Through March 2020 the generally implicit assumption of Western commercially-controlled media was that the virus originated naturally in Wuhan.[10] Alternative suggestions were pretty consistently referred to as "conspiracy theories"[11][12][13][14][15] and Twitter censored Zero Hedge for challenging it.[16]

The BBC claimed in October 2020 that "the vast majority of scientists agree that it crossed into humans from an animal species, most likely a bat."[17]

Academic papers

On 3 February 2020 Nature published A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin, which stated that "2019-nCoV is 96% identical at the whole-genome level to a bat coronavirus". The corresponding author was Zheng-Li Shi, who co-conceived the study. Her 28 co-authors, all Chinese, were mostly from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.[18]

File:The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2.png

In March 2020 Nature published a paper entitled The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 which concluded that "we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible" and that "SARS-CoV-2 originated via natural selection".[19] In January 2021 Nicholson Baker termed it " most influential natural-origin paper".[5]

As well as medical papers, researchers into "conspiracy theories" published pseudo-scientific papers such as Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories? which noted, in April 2020, that "31% [of the US respondents] agree that the virus was purposefully created and spread".[20]

Response

ZeroHedge carried a response[21] by 'Harvard2TheBigHouse' that criticised it as discounting the possibility of unnatural selection, i.e. not gene editing but gain-of-function research by passaging through ferrets.[22]

2012 Yunnan mineshaft outbreak

In 2012, 6 Chinese miners were infected by a hitherto unknown coronavirus in Yunnan province, China. This was dubbed RaTG13 by the lab of Zheng-li Shi at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. In July 2020, Jonathan Latham and Allison Wilson suggested that the virus may have evolved from their samples, and that its high efficacy at infecting humans may have evolved from the months of natural selection in the lungs of the miners, 3 of whom died.[23]

Take 2 - Accidental "lab leak"

File:Luc Montagnier supporting COVID as man made.png

On 24 January 2020, the Washington Times published Coronavirus may have originated in a lab linked to China’s biowarfare program, citing Danny Shoham, a former lieutenant colonel in an Israeli military intelligence unit.[24] This idea was labelled a "conspiracy theory" by commercially-controlled media until early April 2020, when a sharp pivot embraced it as a real possibility.

"Evidence" emerged that suggested the virus may in fact have a connection to the WIV.[25]A report in Fox News in April 2020 claimed that "There is increasing confidence that COVID-19 likely originated in a Wuhan laboratory, though not as a bioweapon".[26]

"Evidence" cited included the claim that "China’s rate of occupational accidents is about ten-times higher than America’s, and some twenty-times more than Europe’s – the only other regions with high-level virology labs."[27] In January 2018, "the U.S. Embassy in Beijing took the unusual step of repeatedly sending U.S. science diplomats to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)", warning of inadequate safety procedures.[28]

Timing

A story in the Daily Mail in April 2020 cited research suggesting that the virus may have emerged as early as September 2019, not in Wuhan,[29] and have been circulating in Europe[30][31] before the official narrative said it was introduced from China.[32]

Late 2019

In May 2020, reports suggested that the virus was in Europe by November 2019 and spreading slowly until it sped up in 2020[33] A French case from December 2019 was reported who had no known connection with Wuhan.[34] In May 2020, Anders Tegnell said he thought it was probably in Sweden by November or December 2019.[35] Genetic research was suggesting that it emerged towards the end of 2019 and spread worldwide, unnoticed, extremely fast.[36]

Various acts of preparation in the US

File:Fort Detrick suhtdown.png

In January 2020 Zhong Nanshan challenged the assumption that the disease began in China and Chinese spokesman Lijian Zhao accused the US in a twitter post: "It might be US army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan. Be transparent! Make public your data! US owe us an explanation!"[37]

July 2019 - Fort Detrick shutdown

In July 2019 the CDC issued Fort Detrick (which the FBI concluded was the source of the anthrax used for the Amerithrax event) with a “cease and desist order” which shut it down for [How many?] months.[38]

August 2019 - EVALI

In August 2019, an new illness was reported in the US which was named "vape lung" or EVALI (E-cigarette/Vaping -Associated Lung Injury).[39][40] "The EVALI and other respiratory viruses share similar symptoms, including shortness of breath, night sweats, low oxygen levels, and hazy spots on a lung X-ray, statnews.com reported, quoting experts, who mentioned the difficulty to "tease apart a bad flu case and a vaping case.""[41][42]

The illness was reported as "a U.S.-specific phenomenon”[43] that began in Illinois and Wisconsin in April 2019. "The first death from a vaping-related illness was reported Aug 23 in Illinois."[44][45]

File:EVALI epidemic.png

{{#subobject: |Has superobject=COVID-19/Origins |Has objectClass=Quotation |Has author=|+sep=, |Has text=“Patients, mostly otherwise healthy and in their late teens and 20s, are showing up with severe shortness of breath, often after suffering for several days with vomiting, fever and fatigue. Some have wound up in the intensive care unit or on a ventilator for weeks. Treatment has been complicated by patients’ lack of knowledge — and sometimes outright denial — about the actual substances they might have used or inhaled.” |Is about=COVID-19/Origins,EVALI|+sep=, |Has wikipediaPage= |Has location=|+sep=, |Has publicationDate= |Sourced from=New York Times |Has sourceDetails= |Has sourceTitle= |Has sourceName=New York Times |Has sourceURL=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/31/health/vaping-marijuana-ecigarettes-sickness.html

}}

“Patients, mostly otherwise healthy and in their late teens and 20s, are showing up with severe shortness of breath, often after suffering for several days with vomiting, fever and fatigue. Some have wound up in the intensive care unit or on a ventilator for weeks. Treatment has been complicated by patients’ lack of knowledge — and sometimes outright denial — about the actual substances they might have used or inhaled.”
' [46]

It "sharply increasing in August 2019 and peaking in September". It was blamed on illicit vaping products, especially those containing cannabis. As of October 15, 2019, the CDC had reported on 1,358 sufferers of EVALI, of whom about 2/3 were male. The median age was 24 and although the median age of fatality was around 50 years.[47]

File:EVALI and Covid-19 compared.png
A comparison between EVALI cases and COVID taken from [this paper] (April 2020)

2019 - CEO resignations

File:Chief executives are leaving in record numbers this year.jpg
An NBC News story from 6 November 2019. It began: "Chief executives are leaving in record numbers this year, with more than 1,332 stepping aside in the period from January through the end of October, according to new data released on Wednesday. While it's not unusual to see CEOs fleeing in the middle of a recession, it is noteworthy to see such a rash of executive exits amid robust corporate earnings and record stock market highs."[48]

Forbes reported on 2 October 2019 on a report by Challenger, Gray & Christmas that CEOs Are Leaving At A Record Pace, Report Finds[49]

18-27 October 2019 - Military World Games

Full article: 2019 Military World Games

The 7th Military World Games was held in late October 2019 in Wuhan, China. Nearly 10,000 athletes took part from over 100 countries. In March 2020 China's foreign ministry spokesperson Lijian Zhao suggested that the “patient zero” of the COVID outbreak in Wuhan may have been a member of the US team. "The Chinese claim, something censored in the US, that the inattentive attitude and disproportionately below average results of American athletes in the game indicates they might have been in for other purposes and they might actually be bio-warfare operatives, and that their place of residence during their stay in Wuhan was also close to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, where the first known cluster of cases occurred."[50]

18 October - Event 201

Full article: Event 201
File:Event 201.jpg

Event 201, co-funded by Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation simulated a global coronavirus pandemic. The final presentation was held in front of an audience on 18 October 2019 and included participants who later played important roles in the COVID-19 Pandemic.[51]

November 2019

According to an ABC News report of April 2020 that the National Center for Medical Intelligence (based in Fort Detrick) had warned the White House in November 2019 that "a contagion was sweeping through China’s Wuhan region, changing the patterns of life and business and posing a threat to the population, according to four sources briefed on the secret reporting."[52] The NCMI took the unusual step of denying it.

Italian researchers are looking at whether a higher than usual number of cases of severe pneumonia and flu in Lombardy in the last quarter of 2019 may be a signal that the new coronavirus might have spread beyond China earlier than previously thought was the headline of a March 2020 report by Reuters.[53]

January 2020 - CDC & FBI prohibit contact testing for COVID-19

The CDC explicitly prohibited epidemiologist Helen Chu from testing contacts of the first known case in Washington state. A paper in the New England Journal of Medicine dates the first US COVID-19 cases as a man who arrived there from Wuhan on 19 January 2020.[54]

February 2020 Haplotype research

In February 2020 research indicated that the US was the only location with all 5 different haplotypes, suggesting that it may have been the origin of the virus.[55] RT reported in April 2020 that "autopsies performed on two people who died at home on February 6 and February 17 show that their tissues were infected with Covid-19, Santa Clara health authorities said".[56]

Miscategorisation of flu deaths

On 13 March 2020, CDC Director, Robert Redfield testified to the US Congress that COVID-19 deaths had been miscategorised as the flu.[57] This inspired questions from China, which were not answered.

Bioweapon?

Watch on YouTube
Francis Boyle on Coronavirus Bioweapon

Various factors have been cited as suggestive that the event may have been a bioweapon, i.e. a false flag attack.[58][59] Nikolai Petrovsky, a professor of endocrinology at Flinders University College of Medicine in Adelaide, Australia, is reported as stating that, “There are indeed many unexplained features of this virus that are hard if not impossible to explain based on a completely natural origin.”[60]

Brian T. Kennedy, chair of the Committee on the Present Danger: China, has tweeted and re-tweeted[61][62][63] a large number of Tweets,[64][65] (some from corporate media with connections to the Committee), claiming the virus originates from a Chinese biological weapons program.

Francis Boyle stated in an interview for GreatGameIndia in February 2020 that he believed the virus is a bioweapon.[66][67][68] In a March 2020 update, Prof Boyle said he believes COVID-19 escaped from the Wuhan BSL-4 lab. He believes the virus is a biowarfare agent produced by "gain-of-function" research, which is why the Chinese government originally tried to cover it up. The Wuhan facility is also a specially designated World Health Organization (WHO) research lab and Dr Boyle contends that the WHO knows full well what is occurring.[69]

The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus

On 6 February 2020 ResearchGate published a brief article by Botao Xiao and Lei Xiao from Guangzhou’s South China University of Technology. It noted that “In summary, somebody was entangled with the evolution of 2019-nCoV coronavirus. In addition to origins of natural recombination and intermediate host, the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan. Safety level may need to be reinforced in high risk biohazardous laboratories. Regulations may be taken to relocate these laboratories far away from city center and other densely populated places.”[70] Botao Xiao told the Wall Street Journal in February that he had withdrawn the paper because it “was not supported by direct proofs.”[71]

Economic war

Full article: COVID-19/Economy

Accusations on both sides are used as part of the ongoing economic war between the US empire and its upcoming rival China.

Cover-up

Scientists were cautions about investigating the origins of the virus, subject to “very intense, very subtle pressures”. Publication of non-zoonic origin after about May 2020 was strongly discouraged. After initial interest in the origin of the virus, the "Chinese government has also restricted their own scholars and scientists from looking into the origins of SARS-CoV-2".[72]

"Investigation"

The WHO appointed Peter Daszak of EcoHealth to head an "investigation" of the origins of the virus.[72] It had already become knwn at that point that in 2020 he had anonymously organised a denial of the lab leak hypothesis, which was published in The Lancet, but had declined to present evidence..

"Fact checking"

Danielle Anderson, who worked Wuhan Institute of Virology for 2 years on bat coronaviruses later became a Facebook "Fact Checker" who claimed that there was no possibility that the virus could have originated there.[73]

Blocking of the COVID Origins Declassification Bill

In July 2021, the US House blocked the COVID Origins Declassification Bill, which would require the Director of National Intelligence to declassify the US government's investigations into the origins of COVID-19. The bill had passed unanimously in the US Senate.[74]

CIA Admission and Cover Up

Although ex-aides of the Biden administration such as Raj Panjabi voiced serious concerns calling the lab theory "plausible", US Congress and the CIA released a statement still denying any link.[75][76] This was deemed more suspicious after the US Representative Brad Wenstrup claimed to possess a written testimony under oath that the virus was artificially created in a lab and released under unclear and nefarious circumstances.[77][78][79]

{{#subobject: |Has superobject=COVID-19/Origins |Has objectClass=Quotation |Has author=Jon Cohen|+sep=, |Has text=“A majority of U.S. intelligence agencies has so far concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic mostly likely started when SARS-CoV-2 jumped from an infected animal host into people; a wildlife market in Wuhan, China, has received intense attention from researchers as the potential source. But the Department of Energy and FBI so far have favored the so-called lab-leak hypothesis, even though none of the agencies has expressed high confidence in their conclusions on COVID-19’s origin. CIA, for example, had reportedly said it was “unable to determine” whether SARS-CoV-2 made a direct jump from animals to humans—or came from a lab.

Now, Representative Brad Wenstrup (R–OH), who chairs the House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, says his panel and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence have heard testimony from a whistleblower “who presents as a highly credible senior-level CIA officer.” According to the press release, the whistleblower testified that only the most senior analyst of a seven-member CIA team investigating the origin of COVID-19 supported the zoonotic transmission theory. The whistleblower alleged the other six team members supporting the lab origin then received “a significant monetary incentive to change their position,” wrote Wenstrup and Representative Mike Turner (R–OH), who chairs the intelligence panel.” |Is about=COVID-19/Origins,Human experimentation, CIA, Covid-19/Origins|+sep=, |Has wikipediaPage= |Has location=|+sep=, |Has publicationDate=September 2023 |Sourced from= |Has sourceDetails=Science.org |Has sourceTitle= |Has sourceName= |Has sourceURL=https://www.science.org/content/article/cia-bribed-its-own-covid-19-origin-team-reject-lab-leak-theory-anonymous-whistleblower

}}

“A majority of U.S. intelligence agencies has so far concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic mostly likely started when SARS-CoV-2 jumped from an infected animal host into people; a wildlife market in Wuhan, China, has received intense attention from researchers as the potential source. But the Department of Energy and FBI so far have favored the so-called lab-leak hypothesis, even though none of the agencies has expressed high confidence in their conclusions on COVID-19’s origin. CIA, for example, had reportedly said it was “unable to determine” whether SARS-CoV-2 made a direct jump from animals to humans—or came from a lab. Now, Representative Brad Wenstrup (R–OH), who chairs the House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, says his panel and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence have heard testimony from a whistleblower “who presents as a highly credible senior-level CIA officer.” According to the press release, the whistleblower testified that only the most senior analyst of a seven-member CIA team investigating the origin of COVID-19 supported the zoonotic transmission theory. The whistleblower alleged the other six team members supporting the lab origin then received “a significant monetary incentive to change their position,” wrote Wenstrup and Representative Mike Turner (R–OH), who chairs the intelligence panel.”
Jon Cohen (September 2023)  [80]

Exposure

File:Dilbert on the pandmic business.jpg
Dilbert from September 2022

In 2022, as large numbers of people emerged from COVID panic, public doubts about the zoonotic origin were increasingly aired. Jeffrey Sachs publicly stated he believed the virus came out of a lab.Template:Cn


References

  1. ↑ https://off-guardian.org/2026/07/29/quick-take-the-fauci-diaries-and-the-lab-leak-renaissance/
  2. ↑ https://www.newsweek.com/china-censoring-research-covid-19-origins-deleted-page-wuhan-university-website-suggests-1497467
  3. ↑ https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ex-cnn-president-jeff-zucker-ordered-staff-ignore-lab-leak-theory
  4. ↑ https://www.gilmorehealth.com/chinese-coronavirus-is-a-man-made-virus-according-to-luc-montagnier-the-man-who-discovered-hiv/
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/coronavirus-lab-escape-theory.html
  6. ↑ Daszak, close friends with the head of the WIV, and who had personally sent millions of dollars of funding their way, claimed to have no competing interests on the topic of the virus origin, also neglected to declare his connection when he wrote a hitpiece for The Guardian
  7. ↑ https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/04/13/121523/
  8. ↑ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8016077/First-coronavirus-patient-NO-connection-Wuhan-seafood-market.html
  9. ↑ https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ecohealth-alliance-orchestrated-key-scientists-statement-natural-origin-sars-cov-2
  10. ↑ https://www.wired.com/story/most-kids-only-get-mildly-sick-from-covid-19-but-not-all/
  11. ↑ https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2020/03/17/covid-19-coronavirus-did-not-come-from-a-lab-study-shows-natural-origins/
  12. ↑ https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/coronavirus-china-bat-patent-conspiracy-theory-942416/
  13. ↑ https://gizmodo.com/the-truth-of-coronavirus-might-be-worse-than-the-conspi-1842492005
  14. ↑ https://www.independent.co.uk/infact/coronavirus-outbreak-conspiracy-theories-fake-news-china-wuhan-vaccine-a9308321.html
  15. ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/01/29/experts-debunk-fringe-theory-linking-chinas-coronavirus-weapons-research/
  16. ↑ https://bigleaguepolitics.com/zerohedge-was-banned-for-twitter-for-reporting-on-coronavirus-potential-origin-months-before-msm-admitted-it-likely-came-from-wuhan-lab/
  17. ↑ https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-54246473
  18. ↑ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2012-7
  19. ↑ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9
  20. ↑ https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/why-do-people-believe-covid-19-conspiracy-theories/
  21. ↑ https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/debunking-nature-magazines-covid-19-definitely-didnt-come-lab-china-propaganda
  22. ↑ https://harvardtothebighouse.com/2020/03/19/china-owns-nature-magazines-ass-debunking-the-proximal-origin-of-sars-cov-2-claiming-covid-19-wasnt-from-a-lab/
  23. ↑ https://jonathanlatham.net/a-proposed-origin-for-sars-cov-2-and-the-covid-19-pandemic/#comment-5997
  24. ↑ https://thegrayzone.com/2020/04/20/trump-media-chinese-lab-coronavirus-conspiracy/
  25. ↑ https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/investigate-the-wuhan-lab
  26. ↑ https://www.foxnews.com/politics/coronavirus-wuhan-lab-china-compete-us-sources
  27. ↑ https://covid19data.com/2020/02/13/sudden-militarization-of-wuhan-biolab-raises-questions/
  28. ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/14/state-department-cables-warned-safety-issues-wuhan-lab-studying-bat-coronaviruses/
  29. ↑ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8231753/Coronavirus-started-spreading-early-September-not-originated-Wuhan.html
  30. ↑ https://www.rt.com/news/487294-france-coronavirus-strain-italy-china/
  31. ↑ https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-italy-timing-idUSKBN21D2IG
  32. ↑ https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/daily-wrap-up/france-says-covid-was-already-silently-circulating-darpas-implantable-nanoplatform-vaccines/
  33. ↑ https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3083599/france-had-covid-19-november-hospital-says-after-analysis-chest
  34. ↑ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/03/french-politicians-row-lockdown-restrictions-can-eased/
  35. ↑ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/05/sweden-says-coronavirus-cases-likely-country-early-november/
  36. ↑ https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/05/health/genetics-coronavirus-spread-study/index.html
  37. ↑ https://mobile.twitter.com/zlj517/status/1238111898828066823
  38. ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/05/health/germs-fort-detrick-biohazard.html
  39. ↑ https://www.webmd.com/lung/features/vaping-illness-symptoms
  40. ↑ AP Archive - Sep 11, 2019 - Los Angeles County reports vaping-related death
  41. ↑ https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1181292.shtml
  42. ↑ https://newswithviews.com/is-this-backstory-the-truth-about-covid-19s-origin/
  43. ↑ https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-vaping-britain-idUSKBN1WT1XP
  44. ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2019/09/07/what-we-know-about-mysterious-vaping-linked-illnesses-deaths/
  45. ↑ http://www.dph.illinois.gov/news/illinois-resident-experiencing-respiratory-illness-after-vaping-dies
  46. ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/31/health/vaping-marijuana-ecigarettes-sickness.html New York Times
  47. ↑ https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/severe-lung-disease.html
  48. ↑ https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/why-have-more-1-000-ceos-left-their-post-past-n1076201
  49. ↑ https://www.forbes.com/sites/samanthatodd/2019/10/02/ceos-are-leaving-at-a-record-pace-report-finds/
  50. ↑ https://www.veteranstoday.com/2020/04/30/china-us-brought-covid19-to-china-during-army-games-hid-disease-in-us-as-influenza/
  51. ↑ For example, Jane Halton was on Australia's National COVID-19 Coordination Commission, Mike Ryan as Executive Director of the WHO's Health Emergencies Programme leads the team responsible for responding to COVID-19.
  52. ↑ https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/intelligence-report-warned-coronavirus-crisis-early-november-sources/story?id=70031273
  53. ↑ https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-italy-timing-idUSKBN21D2IG
  54. ↑ https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001191
  55. ↑ https://www.globalresearch.ca/china-coronavirus-shocking-update/5705196
  56. ↑ https://www.rt.com/usa/486522-first-us-covid-death-earlier/
  57. ↑ http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202003/13/WS5e6b11e0a31012821727ee57.html
  58. ↑ https://helenofdestroy.com/index.php/146-two-birds-with-one-flu-coronavirus-weaponized-against-china-and-american-dissidents
  59. ↑ https://cryptome.org/2020/02/CIA-biovirus-2019.pdf
  60. ↑ https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/coronavirus-lab-escape-theory.html
  61. ↑ https://twitter.com/BritravKennedy/status/1231297944634023936 saved at Archive.is
  62. ↑ https://twitter.com/SenTomCotton/status/1231311580853305344 saved at Archive.is
  63. ↑ https://twitter.com/BritravKennedy/status/1221164214510702592 saved at [http://archive.is/v0QXL Archive.is
  64. ↑ http://archive.today/2020.02.24-181210/https://mobile.twitter.com/BritravKennedy
  65. ↑ http://archive.today/2020.02.24-182750/https://mobile.twitter.com/BritravKennedy?max_id=1227019861722685440
  66. ↑ https://www.zerohedge.com/health/creator-bioweapons-act-says-coronavirus-biological-warfare-weapon
  67. ↑ "Francis Boyle: Wuhan Coronavirus is an 'Offensive Bioweapon'"
  68. ↑ https://www.zerohedge.com/health/creator-bioweapons-act-says-coronavirus-biological-warfare-weapon
  69. ↑ "Prof Francis Boyle Update on Coronavirus Bioweapon"
  70. ↑ https://img-prod.tgcom24.mediaset.it/images/2020/02/16/114720192-5eb8307f-017c-4075-a697-348628da0204.pdf
  71. ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/how-did-covid-19-begin-its-initial-origin-story-is-shaky/2020/04/02/1475d488-7521-11ea-87da-77a8136c1a6d_story.html
  72. ↑ 72.0 72.1 https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/coronavirus-lab-escape-theory.html
  73. ↑ https://www.zerohedge.com/health/conflict-interest-facebook-fact-checker-worked-wuhan-biolab-ruled-out-virus-leak-while
  74. ↑ https://www.zerohedge.com/political/house-democrats-block-covid-origins-declassification-bill
  75. ↑ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12828911/biden-covid-advisor-lab-leak-Dr-panjabi.html
  76. ↑ https://apnews.com/article/covid19-united-states-intelligence-china-23dcbde0be5638556739b564ece97027
  77. ↑ https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/bidens-ex-aide-agrees-wuhan-lab-leak-as-cause-behind-covid-19-pandemic-101702185025571.html
  78. ↑ https://pressgazette.co.uk/publishers/wuhan-lab-leak-journalists-media/
  79. ↑ https://www.science.org/content/article/cia-bribed-its-own-covid-19-origin-team-reject-lab-leak-theory-anonymous-whistleblower
  80. ↑ https://www.science.org/content/article/cia-bribed-its-own-covid-19-origin-team-reject-lab-leak-theory-anonymous-whistleblower Science.org
Retrieved from "https://deeppolitics.org/index.php?title=COVID-19/Origins&oldid=7649"