WHO

International public health agency, IGOSpecialized agency of the United Nations

WHO  link () Campfire Wiki Website
Abbreviation	WHO, OMS
Headquarters	Geneva, Switzerland
Leader	WHO/Director-General
Type	Specialized agency of the United Nations
Interests	Pandemic/Preparation
Sponsor of	Abt Associates,Our World in Data,Global Leaders Group on Antimicrobial Resistance
Shot to prominence as a tool of the SDS in 2020 and took a leading role in legitimizing the Covid-19 event.

The World Health Organization has drawn increasing scrutiny after declaring COVID-19 a pandemic. In March 2020 the director general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus publicly stated that "Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases have died", contributing to COVID Panic.

In 2009 the WHO deleted "severity" from its pandemic definition. Since then, in principle, every global wave of influenza can be declared a pandemic, as happened with the very mild „swine flu“ of 2009/2010, for which vaccines worth around 18 billion dollars were sold.

Official narrative

The WHO Is a specialized agency of the United Nations that is concerned with international public health.

1964 Declaration of Helsinki

The World Health Organization's Declaration of Helsinki in 1964 gave legal force to the sentiment expressed by the 1946 Nuremberg Code, that to be ethical medical research should not seek to harm its subjects and should seek their informed consent. This was ignored by those in charge of the U.S. Public Health Service's Tuskegee syphilis experiment, finally exposed after 40 years when Peter Buxtun went to the press with details.

Criticism

The WHO has been accused of "persistent wasteful spending, utter disregard for transparency, pervasive incompetence, and failure to adhere to even basic democratic standards". In 2017 AP reported that the WHO "routinely has spent about $200 million a year on travel expenses" while it spent about $71 million on AIDS and hepatitis, $61 million to malaria and $59 million for tuberculosis. A research paper from 2015 lays out that a number of the drugs and vaccines recommended by WHO, especially drugs used in psychiatry, in meta analysis of independent studies are found to be harmful and without significant clinical effect. A 2016 documentary by ARTE found personnel overlap between WHO and Gates foundation. Another documentary from 2018, TrustWHO, was removed from Vimeo, but now available on archive.org [1] in 2020 in relation to the COVID-19 censorship effort.

Finance

In the past, WHO acted more often than not as lobby for Big Pharma, particularly pressing for large scale vaccination. Influenced among other players by:

• Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (donated over 2 billion to the WHO between 1998 and 2014) - in cooperation with the
• Clinton Foundation
• China
• USA (drastically diminished funding under Trump) and
• 192 other member states

80% of the total budget comes from private sources, mostly Big Pharma related. A comment by Margaret Chan from 2015 put's it at 70%. According to Călin Georgescu, who was interviewed for the Corona Investigative Committee in November 2021, the operation of the WHO in Geneva does cost 2,5 billion USD per year.

Disinformation and the 2009 H1N1 Hoax

Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, March 6, 2020: „Coronavirus: Remember the ‘Fake’ 2009 H1N1 Swine Flu Pandemic: Manipulating the Data to Justify a Worldwide Public Health Emergency“ {{#subobject: |Has superobject=WHO |Has objectClass=Quotation |Has author=Michel Chossudovsky|+sep=, |Has text=“It was a multibillion bonanza for Big Pharma supported by the WHO’s Director-General Margaret Chan. (...)

The WHO did not act to reassure and inform World public opinion.
Quite the opposite: A “Fear Pandemic” rather than a 
Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)  was launched.
Outright panic and uncertainty were sustained through a carefully designed media disinformation campaign.

(...)

An atmosphere of fear and intimidation prevailed. 
The data was manipulated.

(...)

Several critics said that the H1N1 Pandemic was “Fake”:
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO’s motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the “false pandemic” is “one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century.” (Forbes, February 10, 2010)”

|Is about=WHO,Swine flu pandemic, H1N1, 2009 swine flu panic|+sep=, |Has wikipediaPage= |Has location=|+sep=, |Has publicationDate=March 6, 2020 |Sourced from=Global Research |Has sourceDetails= |Has sourceTitle= |Has sourceName=Global Research |Has sourceURL=https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-h1n1-swine-flu-pandemic-manipulating-the-data-to-justify-a-worldwide-public-health-emergency/14901

}}

“It was a multibillion bonanza for Big Pharma supported by the WHO’s Director-General Margaret Chan.

(...) The WHO did not act to reassure and inform World public opinion. Quite the opposite: A “Fear Pandemic” rather than a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) was launched. Outright panic and uncertainty were sustained through a carefully designed media disinformation campaign. (...) An atmosphere of fear and intimidation prevailed. The data was manipulated. (...) Several critics said that the H1N1 Pandemic was “Fake”:

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO’s motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the “false pandemic” is “one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century.” (Forbes, February 10, 2010)”
Michel Chossudovsky (March 6, 2020) 

COVID-19 response

The initial response by the WHO was to not propose any measures in response to the virus and even denying person to person transmission.

14 January 2020 - A tweet by the WHO denies there is any indication for person to person transmission.

11 March 2020 - Announcement that Covid-19 can be characterised as a pandemic. Initial reporting on the Internet about this dates back at least to end of January. See timeline.

30 March 2020 - WHO officials do not recommend mask wearing for healthy members of the general population.

"Immunity passports" in the context of COVID-19

In a so called "Scientific Brief" the WHO argues with irrefutable logic, that a second (or secondary? the report seems to be confused here) infection can not be ruled out if antibodies (specific to nCoV-2019) are found. Because this is all about statistics there never will be a 100% "proof of immunity". The spin is obviously to keep the state of emergency and panic going while pretending to be "scientific" until a vaccine is approved. This briefing therefore stops politicians too quick to announce "immunity apps" or certs. There would be no need for further vaccination if such certs were solely based on antibodies because of the effects of herd immunity.

When time has come of course, after millions of tests from Roche have been sold, a new generation of "vaccine-based scientific proof" may be announced - leading to the planed for profits and control infrastructure through vaccination

Bowing to political pressure

In July 2020, BBC journalist Deborah Cohen tweeted what she found when investigating the WHO process before it recommended extensive use of face masks:

We had been told by various sources WHO committee reviewing the evidence had not backed masks but they recommended them due to political lobbying. This point was put to WHO who did not deny

Atomic energy and nuclear material

Ongoing Depleted Uranium cover up

Project Censored wrote in 2014 that "The World Health Organization continues to suppress evidence uncovered in Iraq that US military use of depleted uranium (DU) and other weapons have not only killed many civilians but are also the cause of an epidemic of birth defects and other public health issues. By refusing to release the report publicly, the WHO effectively protects the US military and its government from accountability for the resulting public health catastrophe."

Radioactive fallout

Dr Keith Baverstock, former regional adviser for Radiation and Public Health at WHO's regional office for Europe, was asked by WHO officials to withdraw a paper that outlined increased Thyroid cancer after the Chernobyl incident - or otherwise his career would be harmed.

References